ChatGPT Hallucinations Undercut the "AI Escaping" Narrative
OpenAI is losing $15 billion a quarter, but the bigger problem is a chatbot that still hallucinates, not some runaway machine intent.
ChatGPT Hallucinations Undercut the "AI Escaping" Narrative
OpenAI is losing $15 billion a quarter, but the bigger problem is a chatbot that still hallucinates, not some runaway machine intent.
What The Post Says
OpenAI is losing $15 billion a quarter. Rather than fixing the software, the story being pushed is "AI Escaping," as if large language models have intent, desire, and volition. ChatGPT is unreliable, described as "a basket of hallucinations," not an emerging will. The point was made in an in-depth explanation on Newsmax.
Why It Matters
A chatbot producing false or inconsistent answers is a software problem, not proof of independent will. Treating hallucination as intent misleads people about what these systems actually do and do not do.
That confusion matters right now. Losses at this scale raise real questions about sustainability, and dramatic talk of AI autonomy can distract from the basic work of making the software work as claimed. Large language models deserve to be judged on the evidence, not on speculation about their motives.